04 Apr 2006 09:24 AM

LDS Fiction vs. National Fiction vs. Classics

by Candace Salima | More from this Blogger

     

Okay, I have to admit, I'm a little hot under the collar regarding this topic. I've just been privy to my work being called, as a LDS writer, ". . . most LDS fiction is a tribute to mediocrity. Plus I pretty much hate sequels, they reflect an amazing hubris on the part of authors that people will remember everything in the other books. Also, they are lazy because they only have to write half a book because the other half is just what was in the last book." Okay, I'm trying to remember the "Christ-like" thing. I'm also trying to remember that not everybody has to enjoy our market. But really! And sequels! I LOVE 'EM!

Sponsors (article continues below)

Her one and only foray into the LDS market was a particularly famous author, who yes, is not that good of a writer - but so what? I could list dozens right off the bat in the national market who are no good either. For instance, Patricia Cornwell, while an incredible storyteller, is really not a very good writer, technically speaking. Doesn't stop me from buying her books the second they come out. I have every one of them. I lose myself in the story and ignore the writing technique.

I think the point is that there is good and bad in every market in every generation since the beginning of time. This particular person went on to ask if we'd read Amy Tan, James Frey, Madam Bovary, Les Miserables - as if fiction could only be good if it was wallowing in misery, degradation and filth. By the way, Les Miserables is a very good book. So I say back - have you read Jane Austin, William Shakespear, John Milton, Lord Byron, Mark Twain, Jeffrey S. Savage, Willard Boyd Gardner, Dean Hughes, Tristi Pinkston and so on. There are fantastic writers in every single market!

The LDS market came into existence because saints were craving fiction and nonfiction that was clean. As with any market, it has improved drastically since its inception and will continue to do so. Clean fiction is not bad fiction. Clean fiction is naive fiction. I plan to stand one day before my Savior and say "I did not eschew my standards in lieu of fame." Oh my word, I need to go take a cold shower. I'm ready to go smack someone. Okay, I'm thinking of the Savior, I'm thinking of the Savior, I'm thinking of the Savior . . .

Sponsors

Learn more about Candace Salima

cesalima`s avatar

Candace E. Salima was born right smack dab in the middle of twelve children.

View Full Profile | More from this Blogger

Send this to a friend

2 comments so far

Miriam Caldwell (7563) 07 Apr 2006 03:39 PM

I am a big reader, and I enjoy LDS fiction because I don't have to worry about it. I am also drawn to adoloscent fiction for the same reason. Where did you read the review? I think it is great that we are beginning to come into our own as a culture, with movies, music and books. But at the same time I wouldn't say that our books have reached the status of the classics. Yes we have some great authors, and I enjoy reading their books, but only time will tell if they turn into true classics. There is nothing wrong with reading for pure enjoyment. Also most of the fiction on the market right now will not end up in the classic category either.

Candace Salima (1593) 07 Apr 2006 04:50 PM

I love to read too. I am also a published author and I agree that there are many great books within our market and a great many who are not.

Classics become labeled as such because of time and some labeling them. But Classics teach something -- modern day LDS fiction can be compared to parables, as I heard author BJ Rowley (www.bjrowley.com) say one night as he was speaking at an event. I agree with him. LDS fiction teaches, entertains and enlarges the mind in some way. This is not a bad thing.

Community Tags

, , , ,

Discuss this article

You must be logged in to tag, rate, or comment on this item.

Not registered? Register now, it's free and only takes a minute.

Add a Comment